Despite the railways minister harping on about how the Indian Railways have been transformed, the government has instead undone systems and structures in the railways that were developed and nurtured over the decades.
TheIndian Railways (IR), the country’s largest industrial undertaking, is grappling with a dangerous “Modified” world.
This government is tearing apart traditions and systems developed over the decades in the oldest institution in the country. The brute reality is that, barring the sphere of largely unpreventable technology progression, the IR is being vandalised, body and spirit, by a regime that is hell-bent on undermining, when not erasing, the past to project its own performance and burnish the image of the only man who matters in the country today. The leader sets the tone for an organisation. The IR today, caught up in the all-pervasive cultism stalking our land, is headed by a former bureaucrat who never tires of telling us that until Modi took matters in hand, the IR was a sector that was neglected. But it is his boss, the doctor of spin, who has set the pace for such overweening hubris that denies credit to anyone who preceded him.
In May last year, while flagging off the Dehradun-Delhi Vande Bharat Express, the PM dismissed all that the IR had achieved before his reign by saying that parties in power before 2014 made many promises, including on high-speed trains, but years went by without anything happening. He bragged that “all-around work to transform the Railways began only after 2014”. With this comment, he belittled the invaluable contribution of railwaymen and women across the six-odd decades since independence. The dishonesty at the top has percolated down and badly affected every aspect of government-working, including statistical bookkeeping, which is key not only to assessing performance but for taking major decisions. Today, government organisations are so mired in statistical fudging that most government-released data lack credibility.
Amidst this universal deceit, one recalls a time when our country was renowned for the authenticity of its statistics. A critical component of Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai’s visit to India in 1956 was his interaction with a team of statisticians headed by the legendary P.C. Mahalanobis. But from being a cutting-edge statistical powerhouse, the country has degenerated to a stage where our statistical figures are wishful rather than factual and increasingly at odds with the data and assessments of international rating agencies.
The average freight train speeds which were 27.2 kmph in 2010-11 declined to 24.4 kmph in 2019-20 but then, quite inexplicably, shot up to 43.2 kmph in 2020-21 and 37.3 kmph in 2021-22 by employing the simple artifice of deducting the period of major detentions enroute. Regarding financial performance, even the otherwise pussy-footed Comptroller and Auditor General has pointed out the fudging of the operating ratio by removing pension expenditure appropriated to the pension fund from the computation of profitability.
Likewise, there is rigging in calculating the punctuality of trains, the duty hours of loco pilots and a lot else hidden behind the Railways’ iron curtain, where officers cower in complicit silence.
The IR has historically been the mode of transport for the aam janta (common people) who have hitherto been the Railway management’s prime focus. The “vision statement” of 2011-12 stated that the “Indian Railways shall provide safe, efficient, AFFORDABLE, customer-focussed…” transport, clearly spelling out its concern for the common person i.e. the second-class traveller.
Despite protestations of concern for the most disadvantaged sections, the IR is replacing ordinary sleeper coaches from trains running at 130 kmph with AC-three-tier (economy) coaches, the fare of which is more than double the ordinary second-class fare. In the last few years, no new Jan Shatabdi train, which caters mainly to the second-class passenger segment, has been introduced.
A brutal capitalistic ethic reigns behind the veneer of ‘sabka saath sabka vikas’ socialism. The railway minister constantly harps on how the Railways in this regime’s watch has seen real transformation, a radical reformation of systems. But the havoc wreaked, apparently on the ill-conceived advice of a cabal of pet consultants, could more appropriately be described as institutional bombing that has undone systems and structures developed and nurtured over the decades.
These guys are fecklessly advocating change for the sake of change, oblivious to the damaging effects on the system. Take the merger of the Railway Budget with the Union Budget in 2016, disregarding the compelling rationale that the Railways needed to be independent, nimble-footed in decision-making and insulated from the rigid bureaucratic practices that typify government working. A catastrophic consequence of the institutional degradation has been a loss of focus on financial performance and balancing profitability with social obligations.
With the subsuming of the Railway Budget into the General Budget, public oversight and scrutiny of our leading carrier is also no longer possible and that suits a regime that thrives on cloak-and-dagger functioning. Another radical but disastrous decision is the total revamp of the railway management structure in 2019 based on a half-baked understanding of the complexities of the Railways.
The wholesale “homogenisation” of the management cadre was done to combat departmentalism, a term coined to describe the rivalry and hostility between departments within the Railways, but what’s been done is akin to burning down a house to smoke out a rat. Almost five years on, the ministry is still floundering on the rules regarding recruitment, seniority and appointment to key positions.
The most disturbing spin-off from this god awful mess is the fishy new method of selection to the top managerial positions. The traditional, time-tested system of assessment based on record of service as reflected in the annual confidential reports twinned with vigilance clearance regarding integrity has been given the heave-ho in favour of an AB De Villiers-like “360-degree” assessment which, like the great South African’s pyrotechnics, observes no rules.
In 2022, using the crutch of merit in lieu of the time-tested system of seniority-cum-suitability based selection, the ministry chose only eight officers from a pool of 130 aspirants for the coveted post of general manager. Factored into the selection was an assessment of the candidates by an establishment-preferred group of retired bureaucrats who played Solomon, apart from subjecting the candidates to a dubious psycho-analytical test to assess their “emotional quotient”.
In conclusion, one cannot help taking note of how unrestrained this regime has been in its psychotic eagerness to erase, diminish or appropriate whatever was achieved before 2014. Even the Railways’ invaluable heritage has not been spared. In the war with the past, culturally evocative artefacts and institutions have been uprooted to make way for newfangled replacements associated with this regime.
The iconic Darjeeling Hill Railway (DHR) steam locomotive of 1925 vintage, which for decades adorned the front of the Rail Bhawan in New Delhi, was shunted out to the Rail Museum and replaced with a Vande Bharat replica. But what has traumatised Railwaymen past and present has been the uprooting of the Railway Staff College in Vadodara – renamed the National Academy of Indian Railways (NAIR) – which, since 1952, has been the seat of learning for officers of the IR.
A few weeks ago, the ministry directed the NAIR to hand over all its assets to the Gati Shakti Vidyalaya (GSV), a ‘Central University envisioned by PM Narendra Modi’. In one fell sweep, an institution of learning, steeped in railway lore and culture, has been expelled to make way for yet another highfalutin vanity project of the authoritarian.
A leading historian has observed that while history is in the past, heritage is in the present. It provides a visceral link with the spirit of the past and helps inspire a better perspective and understanding of our present. Or to modify what Marcus Garvey said, an institution without knowledge of its history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots. But the philistines who call the shots today couldn’t care less for such soulful niceties. For them, it’s all about one man and his image!
Mathew John , former civil servant
Pub.-The Wire
Archive 1
0 Comments